NUS is no small campus. It has so many faculties and
facilities- Science, Engineering, libraries, the SRC... Utown was even added
recently to provide the booming student population with more lecture theatres
and recreational places. Yet we somehow feel that these are not enough. We need
more classrooms, more lecture theatres, more sports amenities, more
laboratories. But we are already squeezing the very last land space we have,
any more and the school would lose its beauty and liveability. At this point
you might have guessed. Yes, go underground!
Both NUS and NTU have just finished their exploratory
research on the feasibility of underground development. NUS vice-president of
campus infrastructure, Yong Kwet Yew mentioned in an interview by the Straits
Times that going below ground can allow the space of Kent Ridge campus to be
maximised while keeping the present green and open spaces aboveground. He
raised the possibilities of “sports facilities, classrooms, libraries,
auditoriums and even research laboratories, data centres and parking structures”.
However, there was no real proposal for the construction of these buildings and
Dr Yong called for more studies on ways to make underground areas more
comfortable such as using natural illumination.
As for NTU, there are plans to build a four-storey
underground learning centre and a three floors worth of sports hall below
ground. The lucky NTU students would one day get to swim in an underground swimming
pool! (Feng, 2013)
What about SMU you may ask? SMU already has an underground
link-way that connects the five major buildings and the Bras Basah MRT station
(The Business Times, 2013).
Is the idea of expanding underground good news for you? If
we cache some of our buildings underground the surface would look less ‘cluttered’.
We can afford to have more trees and even wildlife. It would be a wise move to shift
air-conditioned buildings below the surface since they would then require less
energy for cooling. However, for large scale buildings like libraries and
auditoriums, safety measures have to be thoroughly studied and communicated to
students. Hence, for a start, laboratories should still remain on the surface
due to the higher risk of a fire hazard where the effects would be more rampant
in underground enclosed spaces.
When we talk about studying, we probably would not think it
a big deal to have it underground, but when it comes to actually living
underground permanently that is when we would start hesitating.
Literature cited:
Feng, Z. K. (2013) NUS, NTU complete studies on underground
campus. The Sunday Times, Home. p.18.
[Online] 14 July 2013. Available from http://newshub.nus.edu.sg/news/1307/PDF/CAMPUS-st-14jul-p18.pdf.
[Accessed 3 October 2014]
The Business Times. (2013) NUS, NTU look into underground
expansion. p.8. [Online] 24 September 2013. Available from http://www.smu.edu.sg/sites/default/files/smu/news_room/smu_in_the_news/2013/sources/sept24/bt_20130924_1.pdf.
[Accessed 3 October 2014]
I wonder...do we actually need all that space? Are all the classrooms and lecture theaters actually being fully utilised at every time of the day? Underground expansion is like some sort of new technology trend and as all other technology trends, Singapore is extremely interested in it. Yes the technology is cool and all but shouldn't we focus on maximising existing structures instead before hopping on to this trend simply because we want appear to be "technologically advanced"?
ReplyDeleteYes indeed Cheryl! We should definitely make full use of whatever structures we have now. But land use planning have to be done early and we should also look at the benefits and promises underground structures can provide us. To cope with the potential increase in population, we may inevitably have to expand. And I have friends who tell me they want an underground linkway like SMU to be built in NUS, so no more long waits and tight squeeze on the shuttle bus! What's more, we would have the incentive to walk between places in school since it is sheltered from the intense heat of the outside and certainly much safer as we are separated from traffic. And it's a healthier lifestyle too!
ReplyDelete